Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add coverage command for ci unit tests #332

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

karrui
Copy link
Collaborator

@karrui karrui commented Sep 24, 2024

feat: add coverage command for ci unit tests

feat: update autogenerated msw script

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
starter-kit ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 9, 2024 9:30am

Copy link
Collaborator Author

karrui commented Sep 24, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @karrui and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@karrui karrui marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2024 08:32
@datadog-opengovsg
Copy link

datadog-opengovsg bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: add_vitest_coverage
Commit report: afef3ec
Test service: starter-kit

✅ 0 Failed, 13 Passed, 0 Skipped, 13.47s Total Time

package.json Outdated
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
"test:vitest": "dotenv -e .env.test vitest run",
"test-dev:vitest": "dotenv -e .env.test vitest",
"test:e2e": "dotenv -e .env.test playwright test",
"test-ci:coverage": "vitest run --coverage",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Why not dotenv -e .env.test instead?

@karrui karrui merged commit f9f331a into main Oct 9, 2024
13 checks passed
@karrui karrui deleted the add_vitest_coverage branch October 9, 2024 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants